Mets playing dangerous waiting game with Bay
The Mets’ strategy with Jason Bay is clear:
Wait him out. Sign him at their price.
The strategy is fine, assuming no other club is bidding for
Bay.
But how can the Mets know that? How can anyone?
If the Mets want Bay, they might need to act sooner than
later. And if they want him, they might need to meet
his price.
Bay, 31, thrived in the high-intensity Boston market. Still,
he is a low-key Canadian from the Pacific Northwest -- and, as a
free agent, he gets to choose his next team.
Why would he sign with the Mets -- a team that is coming off
a 70-win season and could fire its manager and general manager by
July -- if he had a better option?
Such an option might not be readily apparent. But I find it
difficult to believe that the Mets are the only team on Bay, just
as I find it difficult to believe that the Cardinals are the only
team on Matt Holliday.
The market for both players is unclear. I doubt it is
non-existent.
Just consider some recent free-agent signings:
The Mariners never went public with their interest in third
baseman Chone Figgins. The Rangers were not thought to be a major
player for right-hander Rich Harden. The Red Sox barely were linked
to right-hander John Lackey.
Teams usually disguise their intentions in free agency.
Surprises are not uncommon. Remember when the Yankees signed
free-agent first baseman Mark Teixeira last offseason? The Yankees
were not even thought to even be pursuing Teixeira until
practically the moment they signed him.
I cannot tell you which other teams are on Bay. I cannot say
for certain that the Mets even face competition. But it stands to
reason that certain clubs increased their interest after Bay ended
his talks with the Red Sox. It also stands to reason that certain
clubs might be trying to slip in under the Mets.
The Mariners certainly are preferable for Bay geographically;
he is from Trail, B.C., his wife is from Kirkland, Wa. The
M’s additions of Figgins, left-hander Cliff Lee and even left
fielder Milton Bradley demonstrate that GM Jack Zduriencik is
trying to build a contender.
Bay no longer seems to fit after the trade for Bradley. But
maybe that would change if Bay offered himself to the M’s on
a short-term, high- dollar deal.
The Angels loom as another possibility, even though manager
Mike Scioscia has downplayed his team’s interest in Bay.
Scioscia spoke at a time when the Angels were still focused on
Lackey. If, for example, the Angels traded left fielder Juan Rivera
for Braves right-hander Derek Lowe, perhaps they would circle back
to Bay.
Then there are the Giants. They, too, say they are not
interested in Bay. But really, does anyone know what the heck
they’re doing?
Don’t get me wrong -- the Mets are in serious
discussions with Bay, and remain the leading contender to sign him.
But Bay almost certainly would take less to sign with a less
dysfunctional outfit. The longer these negotiations drag on, the
greater the chances that other teams will jump into the bidding.
I can’t say that it will happen. I don’t know
that it will happen.
My point is, neither do the Mets.